12 Angry Men by Sidney Lumet Essay

In the field of psychological science and psychiatry, the trend has always been towards individual therapy. The trend in psychoanalysis has always focused in the individual that the individual occasion and p subterfugeicipation in society has been deemed as secondary.However, recently the trend has been sorrowful towards the mathematical convention with consideration to an individuals psychology having full boot to the manner in which he interacts and participates in his society. Irvin D. Yalom has stated that there be 12 healing(p) factors involved in host psychotherapy. To be up to(p) to fully understand these concepts, a study of the mental picture 12 wroth Men will be analyzed in the point of mess of Yaloms factors.The movie 12 Angry Men by Sidney Lumet is about(predicate) a jury of 12 men trying to settle down the quite a little of an 18 year ageing male child who has been accused of murdering his own father. The building block movie takes place in the jury ro om where all 12 men be locked inside until much(prenominal) time that a square verdict has been r individuallyed. The movie begins with 11 of the fellow members of the jury voting that the child is nefarious. The point then revolves on the process by which the 12th member, played by Henry Fonda, is able to change the verdict into a not guilty decision.See moreThe 3 Types of Satire EssayThe movie becomes a perfect example of Yaloms factors as well as mathematical group therapy as the dynamics that occur within the group slowly shows how each persons subjective psychology and face-to-faceity is brought into the interaction of the group which eventually finalizes the decision of the group. Four of Yaloms factors are most spare in the movie conclave Cohesiveness, Interpersonal Learning, and Catharsis and Existential factors.Group cohesiveness. There are two kinds of cohesiveness and what differentiates the two is the reason for which that group stays together. The two kinds are emotion-related and task related. Emotion-related is the kind of group cohesion founded on emotional connection and feelings members have for the other members of the group. Task-related cohesion is founded on the goals that the group has set for themselves and the achievement of these goals is what makes the group cohesive.In the case of 12 Angry Men, the exclusively similarity that these 12 men have is that they are all members of the jury for this particular case. In the beginning, as each member enters the room, a discussion of past jury duties are discussed and this duty served as a commonality between all the members of the jury. This commonality is a dilettanteish factor that added to the groups cohesion. The main factor is that they all dower the alike(p) goal which is to reach a verdict. The cohesion of the group is get along en obligate by the fact that the door is locked and the group stoolnot leave until such time that they all agree on the verdict without con test. The locked door forced them to become cohesive as well as the duty to decide on the fate of the 18year old boy.Interpersonal Learning. Interpersonal learning bottom be achieved with either an input of information, wherein bulk learn from the feedback that the other members in the group provide, or from an output of information wherein the environment provides an outlet where members stern interact with each other havely and adaptively. Without the output Interpersonal Learning, the cleverness for the members to open up will be hindered and thus input social learning will be greatly limited as the people will hold their thoughts and not circulate the proper feedback required for the others to be able to learn from the experience.In the case of the movie, the initial environment was contri besidesive to any of the jury members to open up. As a matter of fact, the initial environment was quite aloof to the point of hostile. The hostility burst off as one member dissented from the majority vote. This same factor that caused the hostility, however, is the same factor that created the environment for the members of the jury to open up. Because of Henry Fondas quotation who refused to devolve a guilty verdict, a discussion ensued which allowed every virtuoso person in that jury to give his reasoning as to why a guilty verdict should be decided upon. With every champion justification, more information is given out by the people from which the others give a reaction. This reaction serves as the feedback required for people to learn from. in spite of appearance the group there are passive members who just listen rather of fully participating in the interaction. Although, they remain passive, learning is still occurring. finished the interaction of the others in the group, individuals are allowed to assess their own beliefs passively in relation to the discussion going on. This passivity was most apparent in the characters of John Fiedler (Juror 2), E dward Binns (Juror 6) and Robert Webber (Juror 12). They were not fully active in the discussion but whose decisions were based on the learning that occurred due to the interaction of the other members just about them.Catharsis. Catharsis is the purging of strong emotions regarding the past or the present. There are different ways to achieve purification. Some express their emotions through art and literature. The most common, however, is just simply talking about it and having a profound cry about the situation. In the case of a group, catharsis ass occur through the constant interaction that comes into a group. In a sense, to fully achieve catharsis in a group setting, interpersonal learning is required. It is only through an environment when people are open and are allowed to give feedbacks that the opportunity to let go of strong emotions occur.In the movie, 12 Angry Men, a lot of the jurors have their own personal line of works. The characters of Lee Cobb (Juror 3), Jack Klugman (Juror 6), Ed Begley (Juror 10) and George Voskovec (Juror 11) all had strong emotions rooted in their past that was brought to the fore because of the case of the 18 year old boy and the discussion to reach a verdict. Klugman, Begley and Voskovecs issues were mainly rooted in discrimination and prejudice. Klugman had issues about slum children being discriminated as criminals when he was brought up in the slums Begley based on his experiences, had a strong prejudice against unequal people while Voskovecs issues deal with the fact that like the light he is being discriminated as a foreigner/immigrant.The one who achieved the strongest catharsis was the character of Cobb has he experienced problems with his own son and was still having problems with his son. With Cobb, he was trying to get his anger towards his son out on the 18 year old boy who he found ungrateful for killing his father. He didnt care much about the facts but cared only of exacting his revenge towards ung rateful children on the accused. With the constant deliberation as to the verdict, eventually, the truth came out and he was able to fully purge his emotions and give a rational verdict of not guilty. His breakdown was a bless of his complete catharsis regarding the matter of his son as this showed the realization of his problem as well as the release of it.Existential factors. Existential factors confer to the groups acceptance of life responsibilities. Initially, the jury was not judge the responsibility of deciding on the life of the 18 year old boy. They casually decided that he was guilty simply because they had better things to do. It is only Henry Fondas character that made them realize the gravity of their decision. He alone made them accept the groups responsibility over the life and death of an 18 year old boy. As this was accepted, the group in earnest was able to weigh the pros and cons of the situation, re-assess the case in knowledge as well as analyze their selve s and their own lives and make a true decision based on all these factors that affect two their life and the life of the accused boy.In conclusion, the trend in psychology is changing from individual psychoanalysis to group psychotherapy and rightly so as in the present group interaction and group dynamics can be found in almost any universe of society. Moreover, these groups have a great bearing on the lives of the people two as individuals as well as a whole society.The movie 12 Angry Men is a perfect example of the necessary of group psychotherapy as well as an example of how the therapeutic factors work in a given situation for a group. Sometimes, these factors are unconsciously done without the presence of a supervisor or guidance as witnessed in the movie. Notwithstanding, the movie has shown how important it is to have group psychotherapy as there are times where a group can decide on whether or not a person should appease living or should be punished by death.