Effects of Obesity in the United States Navy

When Americans hear the words United States straw hat what im be on comes to their minds? Do they see the completely American boy standing t each, habiliment his dress blues uniform with his bloodless hat tilted to the side? Does he hang like the leghorn on the Cracker Jack box? That apply to be the image of the U. S. Sailor venture when the Grea prove Generation was fighting during earthly concern War II. Now, all a mortal has to do is go online and search U. S. naval forces Sailor in the search locomotive engine and they will find unlimited pictures and videos of leghorns doing every day things as well as supporting our interests around the world.With the invention of the public Wide Web, sailors ar not alone asked to do their crinkles at sea however also be impeccable ambassadors of the American people on shore. Because of this important disassemble of be a service member, it is imperative mood that todays sailor tally that all American boy or girl. While s ailors are adults and must realize responsibility for their own actions, lack of homework and attention to dietary wellness has contri hardlyed to some(prenominal) sailors discharge from service due to cosmos forth of dark blue regulated natural timeworns. The U. S. naval forces celebrated its 235th birthday on October 13th 2010, but the way sailors are being officially evaluated physiologically is further some 35 years old. operable navy commission, (OPNAVINST) 6110. 1 was implemented on June 16, 1976 from a directive given by the fountainhead of naval Operations (CNO). The say purpose of this platform line was To implement a visible fittingness architectural plan for dark blue personnel, regular and reserve, that will meet the regard for physical stamina and strength undeniable for combat effectiveness and mobilization as directed by Secretary Of The Navy Instruction (SECNAVINST) 6100. (Hodgdon, 1999). In the 6110. 1, the term corpulency was defined as e xcessive hookup of plump out in the body manifested by poor muscle tone, flabbiness and folds, multitude out of proportion to body build, dyspnea (difficult or labored breathing), and plonkigue upon loony exertion, all of which detracts from military appearance (Hodgdon, 1999). The fitness course of instruction that was established from this reading was zilch to a greater extent than a modified interpreting of an aerobics program developed by a Dr. Ken Cooper.This aerobics program was a set of warm up exercises and basic calisthenics that were used ground on a points system. This first physical fitness instruction did not involve a physical fitness test. On July 17, 1980, the Navy issued an updated instruction for physical fitness. This instruction was OPNAVINST 6110. 1A which was virtually identical to the original 6110. 1 with the exception of rack uping a fitness test. This test was implemented to set certain standards that all sailors would begin to adhere to as a w ay for the Navy to track the physical readiness of its sailors.For example, a male age 17-25 had to perform a minimum of 30 sit-ups in two minutes 20 push-ups four pull-ups (optional) complete a 1. 5 mile run/walk in 1630 (OPNAVINST 6110. 1A, 1980). On June 29, 1981 subdivision of Defense (DoD) Directive 1308. 1 was implemented. The biggest dissimilitude of this directive was that the Navy implemented a weight control program to add to its physical fitness program. As the Navy started to fine tune its physical examination of its sailors, the chain of pedagogy added and subtracted those elements that they believed define a model sailor.On stately 7, 1986 OPNAVISNT 6110. 1C was issued navy wide (Hodgdon, 1999). There were several major(ip) changes to the 6110. 1. oneness of the more severe changes was that all Navy personnel were required to admit the personal Readiness Test (PRT) in two ways a year. Another change was a health risk screening that unavoidable to be done befor e a sailor was allowed to participate in the PRT. tho another change was that the body fat assessment was to be separated from the PRT and was to be conducted as an individual assessment. chthonian this instruction a spick-and-span technique and impudently standards for measuring body fat was established.One of the most important changes that came from this instruction was that overbold consequences for runing the body fat were established. Under the newfound standard body fat assessment, if a sailor was diagnosed as orotund they were not allowed to participate in the PRT until clear by the medical staff. If the sailor was diagnosed as obese consecutively in a 16 month period they were to be screened for separation from active barter. It is because of these changes in how the Navy Chain of Command viewed its sailors, that the sailor themselves had to re-evaluate how they handled their careers. ahead the implementation of the 6110. series instructions, all a sailor had to d o to be viewed as outstanding was make sealed that they were the field of battle matter experts in their field. This meant reporting for duty early, studying all of the rate teaching manuals, and following the orders of their superiors. The plainly physical standard that a sailor had to maintain was be able to complete their duties in an model(a) manner and be able to learn through a hatch on a ship to fight a fire if need be. They were not considered a bad sailor, or not upright at their job, simply because they filled out their uniform a little routine more than the guy standing nigh to them.When it was time to take their rate development exam they did not evaluate what that sailor looked like in their uniform, the chain of command equitable wanted to make sure that the sailor was fellowshipable about his/her job. These days, to be eligible for advancement you not only need to know your job develop than the other sailor, you also need to look better than him too. Befo re the implementation of these new guidelines, a sailors valuation marks were issued based on job performance. With the changes in the physical fitness instruction come changes in the evaluation action as well.Now if you fail a Physical Fitness Assessment (PFA), it has to be marked and documented on your one-year evaluation. Because of the ever changing rules and regulations of the physical fitness standards of the Navy, the Department of the Navy (DON) is now implementing more formal training geared toward sustenance and weight control. With this training, sailors are being taught that in that location are several benefits to a equilibrize diet. They are being trained that a rubicund diet does not just meliorate their physical health but it also contributes to their mental health.Sailors now have the tools they need to start and maintain these healthy eating habits. The Navy Nutrition and weight unit Control Self-Study Guide is the Navys principal tool that enables service members to improve their health and fitness (Cox, 1996). This guide is being issued to all personnel who are enrolled in the Fitness Enhancement Program (FEP). This program is a mandatory program for those sailors who fail any portion of a PFA. This program is also open to any sailor who wants to learn how to take care of their bodies in a healthy way.With this new outlook of training sailors to take care of their bodies for health reasons and not just to look like the sailor on the Cracker jack up box, more sailors are taking this knowledge with them after they transition from military conduct to civilian life. There is a new standard now for being a sailor. In the past it was all about going out to the bars with your shipmates and having a good time. With the current tempo of operations, a sailor must be get up physically, as well as mentally, to dish Americas call wheresoever they are needed. The Navy is no agelong turning a blind marrow to sailors being out of physical s tandards.If sailors cannot balance a healthy lifestyle as well as train for their jobs, they may be the ones standing on the dockage waving good bye to their ex-shipmates. References Chief of Naval Operations (OP-09) (1908). Physical Fitness. spatial relation of the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction 6110. 1A. Washington, DC Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. 17 July. Cox, L. (1996). NAVY Nutrition and weighting Control Self-Study Guide. Washington, DC United States Navy. Hodgdon, Ph. D. , J. A. (1999, August 18). A History of the U. S. Navy Physical Readiness Program from 1976 to 1999. Human functioning Department Naval Health inquiry Center.